Subscribe to Blog via Email
Most Popular Posts
- Kansas Court of Appeals Jettisons 82-Year-Old Supreme Court Precedent
- Ohio’s “Zone of Employment” Rule Protects Worker Who Clocked Out for Lunch
- Virginia Worker’s “Short-Cut” Results in Denial of Benefits
- Bariatric Surgery: Is it a Workers’ Compensation Medical Benefit?
- 2017’s Top 10 Workers’ Compensation Cases
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Thomas A. Robinson on Arizona High Court Says Nebraska Law Prevents Absolute Assignment of Injured Worker’s Third-Party Claim
- James Harris on Arizona High Court Says Nebraska Law Prevents Absolute Assignment of Injured Worker’s Third-Party Claim
- Thomas A. Robinson on Ohio’s “Zone of Employment” Rule Protects Worker Who Clocked Out for Lunch
- Jerry Murphy on Ohio’s “Zone of Employment” Rule Protects Worker Who Clocked Out for Lunch
- Thomas A. Robinson on Ohio’s “Zone of Employment” Rule Protects Worker Who Clocked Out for Lunch
Archives
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
Categories
Admin
Monthly Archives: June 2012
Oregon: Police Lieutenant’s Injuries During Coffee Break Are Compensable
On Wednesday, the Court of Appeals of Oregon, in McDermed v. City of Eugene, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 796 (June 27, 2012), affirmed an award of workers’ compensation benefits to a police lieutenant who sustained injuries when she was struck … Continue reading
Posted in Case comment
Tagged AOE/COE, arise out of the employment, coffee break, on call, Oregon, police
Comments Off on Oregon: Police Lieutenant’s Injuries During Coffee Break Are Compensable
Ohio: Unpaid Work for Wife’s Business Warranted Forfeiture of Benefits, But Not Finding of Fraudulent Activity
The Supreme Court of Ohio, affirming a decision of a lower level appellate court, recently held that while a claimant could not receive temporary total disability (TTD) benefits for any period in which he or she worked [Ohio Rev. Code … Continue reading
Posted in Case comment
Tagged fraud, misrepresentation, Ohio, temporary total benefits, TTD
Comments Off on Ohio: Unpaid Work for Wife’s Business Warranted Forfeiture of Benefits, But Not Finding of Fraudulent Activity
Missouri: Survivors May Proceed in Tort Against Uninsured Employer After Recovering Workers’ Compensation Benefits From Statutory Employer–No Election of Remedies Problem
In a 4–3 decision, the Supreme Court of Missouri recently reversed the decision of a state trial court that earlier had held a workers’ compensation award against a statutory employer barred a wrongful death claim against the deceased employee’s uninsured … Continue reading
Posted in Case comment
Tagged election of remedies, Missouri, statutory employer, tort action, uninsured employer
Comments Off on Missouri: Survivors May Proceed in Tort Against Uninsured Employer After Recovering Workers’ Compensation Benefits From Statutory Employer–No Election of Remedies Problem
Virginia: Non-Dependent Relative of Deceased Worker Caught in Catch-22
In the vast majority of states, non-dependent relatives of employees who suffer fatal work-related injuries are caught in a Catch-22. Since most state acts limit workers’ compensation death benefits to dependents, they don’t qualify. Yet, based upon the wording of … Continue reading
Posted in Case comment
Tagged dependent, exclusive remdy, non-dependent relatives, Virginia, wrongful death
Comments Off on Virginia: Non-Dependent Relative of Deceased Worker Caught in Catch-22
Maryland: Supervisor May Be Sued By Co-Employee re: Parking Lot Vehicular Accident
All but four states (Arkansas, Missouri, Maryland, Vermont, plus the Virgin Islands) extend immunity from tort liability not only to the employer, but co-employees, at least as long as the co-employee is acting within the course and scope of his … Continue reading
Posted in Case comment
Tagged AOE/COE, co-employee immunity, Exclusive Remedy, Maryland
Comments Off on Maryland: Supervisor May Be Sued By Co-Employee re: Parking Lot Vehicular Accident
US: 2010 Statutory Amendment Spelled “Certain” Demise of Oklahoma’s “Substantially Certain” Rule in Intentional Injury Actions Against Employers
An important exception to the exclusive remedy rule relates to intentional injury inflicted by the employer on an employee. Several legal theories have been advanced to support the exception. The best is that the employer will not be heard to … Continue reading
Posted in Case comment
Tagged exclusive remdy, Federal, intentional tort, Oklahoma, substantial certainty, substantially certain
Comments Off on US: 2010 Statutory Amendment Spelled “Certain” Demise of Oklahoma’s “Substantially Certain” Rule in Intentional Injury Actions Against Employers
Arkansas: Only Partial Offset of Claimant’s Disability Benefits By Retirement Benefits Allowed
Workers’ compensation, unemployment compensation, nonoccupational sickness and disability insurance, and old age and survivors’ and disability insurance are all based upon a common principle and a common operative fact: wage loss. Generally, the cause of the wage loss dictates the … Continue reading →
Share this: