Monthly Archives: January 2019

Husband/Wife Bakery Ends Up With Two Policies; Insurers Must Split Cost of Death Claim

Policy Procured “by Mistake” Remains in Force Since Cancellation Wasn’t Done According to Missouri Law Cancellation of a workers’ compensation insurance policy, even when both the insured and the insurer contend the policy was issued by mistake, must be in … Continue reading

Posted in Case comment | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Husband/Wife Bakery Ends Up With Two Policies; Insurers Must Split Cost of Death Claim

Florida Comp Act’s Drug-Free Workplace Program Statute Provides no Private Right of Action

Unsuccessful Job Applicant Sought to Utilize Statute After Passing Drug Test, But Not Getting Job § 440.102, Fla. Stat., which establishes a drug-free workplace program as part of Florida’s overall worker’s compensation scheme, does not provide a private right of … Continue reading

Posted in Case comment | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Florida Comp Act’s Drug-Free Workplace Program Statute Provides no Private Right of Action

Kentucky Considers PTSD Benefits—but Only for First Responders

Animal Farm Logic: “All [workers] are equal, but some [workers] are more equal than others.” House Bill 40, which would provide workers’ compensation benefits for post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD), but only for certain specified first responders, was introduced into the … Continue reading

Posted in Case comment | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Kentucky Considers PTSD Benefits—but Only for First Responders

The Top 10 Bizarre Workers’ Comp Cases for 2018

Annual “Bizarre” List Began More Than 30 Years Ago More than 30 years ago, my mentor, Dr. Arthur Larson, and I began a quirky New Year’s tradition. Early one January evening, we sat together in his home on Learned Place, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Top 10 Bizarre Workers’ Comp Cases for 2018