Subscribe to Blog via Email
-
Most Popular Posts
- Pennsylvania Ex-Husband’s LHWCA Benefits Subject to Attachment by Former Spouse for Unpaid Alimony
- Florida Appellate Court Throws Out Judge Cueto’s “Padgett” Decision on Procedural Grounds
- Nevada Work Release Inmate’s Injuries Are Responsibility of Employer, Not State
- 29-Month Delay in Filing North Dakota Claim Bars Recovery
- Oklahoma Legislature Can't Agree on Opt Out Fix
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Thomas A. Robinson on Ohio’s “Zone of Employment” Rule Protects Worker Who Clocked Out for Lunch
- Jerry Murphy on Ohio’s “Zone of Employment” Rule Protects Worker Who Clocked Out for Lunch
- Thomas A. Robinson on Ohio’s “Zone of Employment” Rule Protects Worker Who Clocked Out for Lunch
- MV on Ohio’s “Zone of Employment” Rule Protects Worker Who Clocked Out for Lunch
- Thomas A. Robinson on Protz “Fix” Awaits PA Governor’s Signature
Archives
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
Categories
Admin
Tag Archives: arising out of employment
Nevada Casino Employee’s Tort Action Against Employer for Delaying Stroke Treatment is Barred by Exclusivity
A housekeeping employee at a Las Vegas casino, who suffered a stroke just prior to the beginning of his work shift, and who contended his medical condition was exacerbated when his employer failed to seek special medical assistance within a … Continue reading
Posted in Case comment
Tagged AOE/COE, arising out of employment, delay, delay in treatment, Exclusive Remedy, Nevada, stroke, tort
Comments Off on Nevada Casino Employee’s Tort Action Against Employer for Delaying Stroke Treatment is Barred by Exclusivity
Kansas Worker Gets No Benefits For Early Morning Injuries While Walking to Hotel
A Kansas roofer, who sustained catastrophic injuries when he was struck by a drunk driver as the roofer walked from a bar to his hotel at 2:20 a.m., could not recover workers’ compensation benefits for his injuries. The roofer’s injuries … Continue reading
Posted in Case comment
Tagged AOE/COE, arising out of employment, course of employment, drunk driver, going and coming, hotel, Kansas, traveling employee
Comments Off on Kansas Worker Gets No Benefits For Early Morning Injuries While Walking to Hotel
NC Employee’s Injuries From Fainting After Toking on E-Cigarette Did Not Arise From the Employment
The North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of workers’ compensation benefits to a city employee who sustained serious injuries to his right hip, back, and head when he passed out and fell to the ground after getting choked … Continue reading
Posted in Case comment
Tagged AOE/COE, arising out of employment, idiopathic, North Carolina, unexplained fall
Comments Off on NC Employee’s Injuries From Fainting After Toking on E-Cigarette Did Not Arise From the Employment
Virginia Case Shows “On-the-Job” Injuries May Not be Compensable
The phrase is used quite often, even by attorneys: “He [or she] was hurt ‘on-the-job.’” The typical implication is that a worker who sustains an “on-the-job” injury deserves workers’ compensation benefits. Such use of imprecise language leads many claimants to … Continue reading
Posted in Case comment, Issue commentary
Tagged actual risk, AOE/COE, arising out of employment, back injury, on-the-job, positional risk, Virginia
Comments Off on Virginia Case Shows “On-the-Job” Injuries May Not be Compensable
Oregon: Traveling Employee’s Death While Returning From Shopping Trip Was Not Compensable
A person in the status of a traveling employee is continuously within the course and scope of the employment while traveling, except when the person is engaged in a distinct departure on a personal errand, held the Court of Appeals … Continue reading
Posted in Case comment
Tagged AOE/COE, arising out of employment, departure, deviation, excursion, Oregon, personal errand, traveling employee
Comments Off on Oregon: Traveling Employee’s Death While Returning From Shopping Trip Was Not Compensable
Missouri Court Stresses Importance of Injury “by Accident” in Recent Horseplay Case
The Missouri Court of Appeals recently affirmed a decision of that state’s Labor and Industrial Relations Commission that had denied workers’ compensation benefits to a tire shop employee who sustained severe burns when he used a lighter to ignite a … Continue reading
Posted in Case comment
Tagged AOE/COE, arising out of employment, horseplay, intentional act, intentional injury, Missouri
Comments Off on Missouri Court Stresses Importance of Injury “by Accident” in Recent Horseplay Case
Illinois Court Says “Ordinary” Reaching Activity is Nevertheless Risk of Employment
Acknowledging that there are three categories of risk to which an employee may be exposed: (1) risks distinctly associated with her employment; (2) personal risks; and (3) neutral risks which have no particular employment or personal characteristics, an Illinois appellate … Continue reading
Posted in Case comment
Tagged AOE/COE, arising out of employment, Illinois, ordinary
Comments Off on Illinois Court Says “Ordinary” Reaching Activity is Nevertheless Risk of Employment
NY Employee’s Shoulder Injury While Scanning Parking Pass Not Compensable
An employee, who sustained a shoulder injury as she reached out of her car window to scan her parking pass at a parking garage near her place of employment, did not sustain an injury arising out of and in the … Continue reading →
Share this: