Tag Archives: employee status

Maryland Cab Driver’s “Misclassification” Action Appropriately Dismissed

Misclassification of Workers is not Recognized as independent Tort A Maryland cab driver, who sustained injuries in a work-related auto accident, may not maintain a civil action against the cab company for “independent contractor misclassification,” held a state appellate court … Continue reading

Posted in Case comment | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Maryland Cab Driver’s “Misclassification” Action Appropriately Dismissed

California High Court Narrows Rule For Classification of Workers as Independent Contractors

CA Employers: Stock Up on Your W-2s; Recycle Your 1099s In a decision that continues California’s trend toward allowing the designation of a worker as an independent contractor only under rare circumstances, the state’s Supreme Court on Monday held that … Continue reading

Posted in Case comment | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on California High Court Narrows Rule For Classification of Workers as Independent Contractors

“Star” Opera Singer is not Employee of the Metropolitan Opera House

A New York appellate court has agreed with Wendy White, prominent opera singer at the Metropolitan Opera House at Lincoln Center (“the Met”), that White is not an employee and, therefore, may maintain a civil action in negligence against the … Continue reading

Posted in Case comment | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on “Star” Opera Singer is not Employee of the Metropolitan Opera House

Juries Will Decide if Uber and Lyft Drivers are Employees

Supplementing my earlier post, in separate rulings yesterday, both Uber and Lyft failed to satisfy United States District Court judges that their drivers are independent contractors and not employees [see Cotter v. Lyft Inc., 13-cv–04065, and O’Connor v. Uber Technologies … Continue reading

Posted in Case comment | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Juries Will Decide if Uber and Lyft Drivers are Employees

Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Independent Contractor-Employee Distinction

In a 6–1 decision, the Supreme Court of Michigan has reversed a 2013 decision of a special panel of the state’s Court of Appeals, finding that a landscape worker was an independent contractor and not an employee of the defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Case comment | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Independent Contractor-Employee Distinction