Tag Archives: exclusivity

Florida Supreme Court Delivers Coup de Gras to Padgett

In a short—yet stinging—Order issued late yesterday [December 22, 2015], the Supreme Court of Florida declined to accept jurisdiction and accordingly denied a petition for review that had been filed by a claimants’ group seeking to overturn the exclusive remedy … Continue reading

Posted in Case comment | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Florida Supreme Court Delivers Coup de Gras to Padgett

Florida Appellate Court Throws Out Judge Cueto’s “Padgett” Decision on Procedural Grounds

Earlier today (June 24th), Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal reversed and completely repudiated the decision of Judge Jorge E. Cueto, Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, that had, on August 19, 2014, held the exclusive remedy provision of the state’s Workers’ … Continue reading

Posted in Case comment | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Florida Appellate Court Throws Out Judge Cueto’s “Padgett” Decision on Procedural Grounds

For Now, Exclusivity Does Not Bar Workers’ Tort Cases Against BP Products Following 2011 Chemical Release at Refinery

A Federal District Court in Texas has refused to grant a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant BP Products North America, Inc. (“BP Products”) in a civil action arising out of an alleged chemical release at the BP refinery … Continue reading

Posted in Case comment | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on For Now, Exclusivity Does Not Bar Workers’ Tort Cases Against BP Products Following 2011 Chemical Release at Refinery

US: Establishing “Substantial Certainty” in Intentional Tort Cases is Difficult

Construing La. Rev. Stat. § 23:1032, which generally provides that workers’ compensation is the exclusive remedy of an employee injured within the course and scope of the employment unless the act causing the injury was an intentional act, and observing … Continue reading

Posted in Case comment | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on US: Establishing “Substantial Certainty” in Intentional Tort Cases is Difficult

Washington: School Custodian’s Tort Claim Against Employer for PTSD Resulting From Clean-up Duties Following Student’s Suicide Is Barred by Exclusivity

Last Thursday, a Washington state appellate court affirmed the dismissal of a civil action filed by a school custodian against her employer, a school district and its superintendent, alleging intentional and negligent infliction of emotion distress that allegedly resulted when … Continue reading

Posted in Case comment | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Washington: School Custodian’s Tort Claim Against Employer for PTSD Resulting From Clean-up Duties Following Student’s Suicide Is Barred by Exclusivity