In a divided opinion, an Ohio appellate court affirmed a decision of a state trial court that granted summary judgment to an employer in a death benefits case that had...
Extension of Statute of Limitations in Ohio R. C. 4123.28 Does Not Apply to Death Claims Extension of Statute of Limitations in Ohio R. C. 4123.28 Does Not Apply to Death ClaimsA decision by the New York Workers’ Compensation Board that a claimant should have been aware of the work-related nature of his back pain and injury in June 2017, at...
NY Board Errs in Setting Disablement Date for Repetitive Stress Injury NY Board Errs in Setting Disablement Date for Repetitive Stress InjuryA divided panel of the North Carolina Court of Appeals recently affirmed a decision by the state’s Industrial Commission that had found it lacked jurisdiction to hear a widow’s death...
For Limitations Purposes, a NC Death Claim Cannot Piggy-Back Onto Deceased Employee’s Original Filing For Limitations Purposes, a NC Death Claim Cannot Piggy-Back Onto Deceased Employee’s Original FilingOCGA § 34-9-11.1, Georgia’s statute that gives the insurer (or employer) the right to “assert the employee’s cause of action in tort” against a third party or parties if the...
Subrogated Georgia Insurer Has No Fiduciary Duty to Protect Injured Employee’s Interests Subrogated Georgia Insurer Has No Fiduciary Duty to Protect Injured Employee’s InterestsW. Va. Code 23-4-15(a), which requires workers’ compensation claims to be filed within six months from and after the date of injury or death, as the case may be, is...
West Virginia Court Stresses Six-Month Statute of Limitations is Strictly Construed West Virginia Court Stresses Six-Month Statute of Limitations is Strictly ConstruedAcknowledging the relative informality within the South Dakota workers’ compensation laws as well as the public policy that the state’s Workers’ Compensation Act and its rules should be construed liberally...
SD Worker’s Letter Asking for “Review of Benefits” Was Inadequate to Toll Limitations Statute SD Worker’s Letter Asking for “Review of Benefits” Was Inadequate to Toll Limitations StatuteIn an unpublished decision, the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court of Tennessee affirmed a decision of a state trial court that found an employee’s workers’ compensation...
Attorney’s Knowledge of Work-Relatedness Imputed to TN Claimant, Barring Claim as Untimely Filed Attorney’s Knowledge of Work-Relatedness Imputed to TN Claimant, Barring Claim as Untimely FiledA Virginia pharmacy is a “health care provider” that must file its claims within the one-year period prescribed in Va. Code Ann. § 65.2-605.1(F), held the Court of Appeals of...
Virginia Pharmacy is “Health Care Provider” for Purposes of Statute of Limitations Virginia Pharmacy is “Health Care Provider” for Purposes of Statute of LimitationsThe 120-day period for providing notice of injury to the employer found in Section 311 of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act [77 P.S. §631] is, as are all time frames...
Sunday Doesn’t Count for PA’s 120-day Notice to Employer Even if It’s Open for Business Sunday Doesn’t Count for PA’s 120-day Notice to Employer Even if It’s Open for Business