Tag Archives: Uber

SC Court Signals That Uber Business Model Probably OK in the Palmetto State

E-businesses like Uber and Lyft, which utilize smartphone or tablet apps to connect passengers and drivers with vehicles for hire are beginning to carve out a niche within the economy. As I mentioned in an earlier post, the Uber/Lyft business … Continue reading

Posted in Issue commentary | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on SC Court Signals That Uber Business Model Probably OK in the Palmetto State

Proposed Alaska Legislation Would Clarify That Uber and Lyft Drivers Are Not Entitled to Comp Benefits

As I mentioned in an earlier post, juries in two civil actions pending before a federal court sitting in California will be allowed to determine if Uber and Lyft have the right to exercise sufficient control over California drivers to … Continue reading

Posted in Issue commentary | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Proposed Alaska Legislation Would Clarify That Uber and Lyft Drivers Are Not Entitled to Comp Benefits

Juries Will Decide if Uber and Lyft Drivers are Employees

Supplementing my earlier post, in separate rulings yesterday, both Uber and Lyft failed to satisfy United States District Court judges that their drivers are independent contractors and not employees [see Cotter v. Lyft Inc., 13-cv–04065, and O’Connor v. Uber Technologies … Continue reading

Posted in Case comment | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Juries Will Decide if Uber and Lyft Drivers are Employees

Could Employee Classification Issues Uberwhelm the Uber Business Model?

Arguments were held last week in connection with motions pending in a federal lawsuit [O’Connor v. Uber, 13–3826, U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal.- San Francisco] that could put an ugly dent into the virtual fender of Uber, the app-based transportation … Continue reading

Posted in Issue commentary | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Could Employee Classification Issues Uberwhelm the Uber Business Model?